With the determination of a fervent researcher, Susan Orlean reveals the story behind a canine dynasty in Rin Tin Tin. Tracing back to the first dog’s owner, Orlean follows Rin Tin Tin as a war orphan puppy through the generations that followed.
Orlean not only carefully documents the first Rin Tin Tin’s life with memorabilia and papers from his owner, Lee Duncan, she also editorializes her mission.
“Could it be that we fill out our lives, experience all that we experience, and then simply leave this world and are forgotten? I can’t bear thinking that existence is so insubstantial… a race against this idea of disappearing…the narrative of Rin Tin Tin…was the tale of lost families…of the way we live with animals…the story of an extraordinary journey…he could leap twelve feet, and he could leap through time…”
The story is extraordinary – from the first dog star on the silent movie screen to vaudeville and then the idea for his progeny to star on television in the fifties. Unfortunately, Rin Tin Tin IV was not the major actor in the television series – only the back-up to the renamed and more talented dog Flame, who did “all the work for Rin Tin Tin.” Whether or not the line from the first war dog was unbroken is ambiguous, but Orleans clearly applauds Duncan’s affinity for dogs and his training – “he was a dog man who happened into Hollywood.” Subsequent generations of German Shepherd television stand-ins benefitted from the fame and skill of that first Rin Tin Tin.
Orlean’s tone is detailed and conversational with clear historical perspective; sometimes she gets carried away with more than you need to know, but she is clearly enamoured of her topic. For dog lovers, the poignant moments are irresistible, but her diversions into accounts of the wars, other trainers, and her comments on dog training and the world in general often get in the way of the story you want to read – sometime blurring the focus from Rin Tin Tin. In her efforts to fill in every detail, she detours into franchise lawsuits, imposters posing as former child stars, would-be trainers claiming the name for dog food; the Rin Tin dynasty gone awry.
Aside from her penchant for sifting through endless minutia and including it in her narrative, Orleans is the kind of writer who makes you feel that you know her personally. As she mulls over some piece of information or her grandfather’s toy Rin Tin Tin, she makes you feel you are in the room with her. If you can persevere through her long episodes, you will learn something about her as well as about the dog. Orlean believes …
“There will always be a Rin Tin Tin because there will always be stories.”
You know, I think there is such a difference in non-fiction writing, and the wrong book can turn a person off non-fiction for good (which is weird, because a bad novel doesn’t turn people off novels for good….). The knowing how much information to include, the skill to weave the main story through-out the information, and the raw ability to write a good tale – all of these need to come together to make a really good non-fiction book. The best ones captivate me more than the best novels. Again, however, I come back to the editor as well. A skilled, non-fiction editor can help steer a writer through the pitfalls.
The book itself sounds interesting!
You make some good point; I also think a lot has to do with the reader’s interest in the topic.